The Asian Commercial Sex Scene

The Asian Commercial Sex Scene (https://sbfonline.site/index.php)
-   The Legal Geylang (prostitute) Scene (https://sbfonline.site/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility (https://sbfonline.site/showthread.php?t=603462)

sammyboyfor 29-04-2016 02:01 PM

A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
Rather than argue and fight in each thread, how about assigning all the regular contributors a thread each.

Max Priest one thread for all his FRs.

Omnia another thread etc.

etc etc

The market then decides which thread is worth reading.

The views of each thread will add up over time and the world will be able to see very clearly which thread has the highest viewership.

comm 29-04-2016 02:50 PM

Re: A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
Boss....i had the exact same idea too

originally i thought of

1) limit FR posting to authors own thread exactly like your suggestion

2) allow a select group of authors to post their FRs to the general FR threads like the cat150 frs or the cat50 thai frs

3) limiting the house threads to posting of WL physical description, new arrivals and gossips

but i was worried it will be too big a change and in the end did not suggest it

Fat Fatt 29-04-2016 03:20 PM

Re: A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
Sounds good on paper.
But just that everyone may want to have his own thread, most people very "EGO" one. Then how many threads do we have for so many cheongsters

yesterdaynews 29-04-2016 04:25 PM

Re: A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor (Post 14529400)
Rather than argue and fight in each thread, how about assigning all the regular contributors a thread each.

Max Priest one thread for all his FRs.

Omnia another thread etc.

etc etc

The market then decides which thread is worth reading.

The views of each thread will add up over time and the world will be able to see very clearly which thread has the highest viewership.

Close down your shit forum la. Max Priest already has two threads called 1654a and Nostalgia JB Auntie. You know, I know, everybody know. Over the years, you've repeated your view that service is subjective. Which we all know to be the gospel truth. The problem is that the OKT runners (aka as Max Priest) uses this to explain away all the nonsense in his FRs. You say Ding Ding (0819), who has left, gave good service, hardly anyone will disagree. You say An An (1654A) give good service, you must have just come out of the mental asylum. We're not talking about how service varies but how OKT runners like Max use this disclaimer to write FAKE FRs. No big deal with highest viewership. Max is a great read. His attempts at erotica are hilarious.

sammyboyfor 29-04-2016 05:34 PM

Re: A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yesterdaynews (Post 14529973)
Close down your shit forum la. Max Priest already has two threads called 1654a and Nostalgia JB Auntie. You know, I know, everybody know. Over the years, you've repeated your view that service is subjective. Which we all know to be the gospel truth. The problem is that the OKT runners (aka as Max Priest) uses this to explain away all the nonsense in his FRs. You say Ding Ding (0819), who has left, gave good service, hardly anyone will disagree. You say An An (1654A) give good service, you must have just come out of the mental asylum. We're not talking about how service varies but how OKT runners like Max use this disclaimer to write FAKE FRs. No big deal with highest viewership. Max is a great read. His attempts at erotica are hilarious.

This forum isn't just about geylang legal whores there are other sections that are doing fine so I'm not going to close the whole forum just because of one bad apple.

However if the Geylang section does not serve its purpose I can easily delete it in less than 10 seconds. If the majority here request its removal I'll do the necessary.

Fat Fatt 29-04-2016 05:47 PM

Re: A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor (Post 14530178)
This forum isn't just about geylang legal whores there are other sections that are doing fine so I'm not going to close the whole forum just because of one bad apple.

However if the Geylang section does not serve its purpose I can easily delete it in less than 10 seconds. If the majority here request its removal I'll do the necessary.

Please ignore the noise. The forum is doing just fine.
Thank you boss for continuing

max_priest 29-04-2016 05:47 PM

Re: A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor (Post 14530178)
This forum isn't just about geylang legal whores there are other sections that are doing fine so I'm not going to close the whole forum just because of one bad apple.

However if the Geylang section does not serve its purpose I can easily delete it in less than 10 seconds. If the majority here request its removal I'll do the necessary.

Well said, man!

If any 10 samsters (min) with a power of at least 12, rep points of at least 1,000 and has been contributing genuine FRs on GL CAT150 whores currently or in the past for a period of time (min 10 FRs) come up and challenge all my FRs that they were fake over the years since my inception in SBF, I shall then stop contributing without qualms. These 10 samsters must at least factually let me know in which way my FR were fake.

Obviously the above clone, yesterdaynews would not qualify to comment and vote me out. But am not certain about his Master. :D

sammyboyfor 29-04-2016 06:10 PM

Re: A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by max_priest (Post 14530206)
Well said, man!

If any 10 samsters (min) with a power of at least 12, rep points of at least 1,000 and has been contributing genuine FRs on GL CAT150 whores currently or in the past for a period of time (min 10 FRs) come up and challenge all my FRs that they were fake over the years since my inception in SBF, I shall then stop contributing without qualms. These 10 samsters must at least factually let me know in which way my FR were fake.

Obviously the above clone, yesterdaynews would not qualify to comment and vote me out. But am not certain about his Master. :D

We can easily define who qualifies to own a thread. You would qualify and the rule would be that only you can post in your own thread and you don't disturb other threads either.

Others who qualify would do the same and instead of fighting in all the threads we simply leave it to the market to decide which thread is worth reading

Nato17 29-04-2016 06:22 PM

Re: A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor (Post 14530310)
We can easily define who qualifies to own a thread. You would qualify and the rule would be that only you can post in your own thread and you don't disturb other threads either.

Others who qualify would do the same and instead of fighting in all the threads we simply leave it to the market to decide which thread is worth reading

Alamak. They got own thread then how about the Boss of L69H69 then huh? Do I get my own thread? lol.

Unfit would then get his own thread called GL Uber.

Mr_don_juan 29-04-2016 06:22 PM

Re: A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yesterdaynews (Post 14529973)
Close down your shit forum la. Max Priest already has two threads called 1654a and Nostalgia JB Auntie. You know, I know, everybody know. Over the years, you've repeated your view that service is subjective. Which we all know to be the gospel truth. The problem is that the OKT runners (aka as Max Priest) uses this to explain away all the nonsense in his FRs. You say Ding Ding (0819), who has left, gave good service, hardly anyone will disagree. You say An An (1654A) give good service, you must have just come out of the mental asylum. We're not talking about how service varies but how OKT runners like Max use this disclaimer to write FAKE FRs. No big deal with highest viewership. Max is a great read. His attempts at erotica are hilarious.

An An 1654 is ang pai what.

She doesnt give good service to u doesnt mean i dont get good service. I get gd service frm her. Sometimes look into the mirror see what wrong lah. It can because u smelly,poor hygenie or fat like pig. Frs is only a guideline,u can reject if u dont like the look.

How u know is fake?Writing frs is like storybook nothing wrong. u just need to go dwn experience urself. i am once the top fr writer of fl dome2. U need to write to keep readers excited not some boring shit.

sammyboyfor 29-04-2016 06:35 PM

Re: A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nato17 (Post 14530351)
Alamak. They got own thread then how about the Boss of L69H69 then huh? Do I get my own thread? lol.

Unfit would then get his own thread called GL Uber.

I'll leave it for Comm the moderator to decide. I know nothing about geylang anymore.

The last time I fucked a girl there was in 1990. It was a different world then. I went there with a list of 8 names written in my Filofax. No internet in those days. I got the names from one of my vendors.

That's how the idea of starting this forum came about when the internet arrived.

groo 29-04-2016 06:51 PM

Re: A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
**Ahem!** Not everybody EGO one leh! Some cheongsters love to share, so will write FRs after paying homage to the love holes lor... :D:rolleyes::D
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Fatt (Post 14529715)
Sounds good on paper...But just that everyone may want to have his own thread, most people very "EGO" one. Then how many threads do we have for so many cheongsters


jaskiew 29-04-2016 07:29 PM

Re: A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor (Post 14529400)
Rather than argue and fight in each thread, how about assigning all the regular contributors a thread each.

Max Priest one thread for all his FRs.

Omnia another thread etc.

etc etc

The market then decides which thread is worth reading.

The views of each thread will add up over time and the world will be able to see very clearly which thread has the highest viewership.

A vote up or down system should be good enough, we will know if a certain reviewer is lying.

Sammyboy have enough members to vote down a fake review.

On your part you must remove duplicate accounts , I wonder if a SMS verified account adds authenticity to a review, follow Amazon practice

comm 29-04-2016 07:34 PM

Re: A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nato17 (Post 14530351)
Alamak. They got own thread then how about the Boss of L69H69 then huh? Do I get my own thread? lol.

Unfit would then get his own thread called GL Uber.

Hmm, they do not get a thread but they are free to start a thread if they want

Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor (Post 14530379)
I'll leave it for Comm the moderator to decide. I know nothing about geylang anymore.

The last time I fucked a girl there was in 1990. It was a different world then. I went there with a list of 8 names written in my Filofax. No internet in those days. I got the names from one of my vendors.

That's how the idea of starting this forum came about when the internet arrived.

interesting history :D

Nato17 29-04-2016 07:36 PM

Re: A suggestion regarding FRs and their credibility
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaskiew (Post 14530621)
A vote up or down system should be good enough, we will know if a certain reviewer is lying.

Sammyboy have enough members to vote down a fake review.

On your part you must remove duplicate accounts , I wonder if a SMS verified account adds authenticity to a review, follow Amazon practice

Another keh kiang person. Add SMS! You want the whole world to know your phone number even. Good call, NOT!


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 02:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Custom
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copywrong © Samuel Leong 2006 ~ 2026