Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)

[kombust]

Originally Posted by sta123sta

https://tt vip7.com/girl.php?id=3996

Vivi

Super bad bonk. Came out of retirement. Forgot how many misses i had in the past. I guess this helps to refresh my memory.

Looks: 6.5 (30% off photos)
Age: NOT 22... not even close. More like late 30s to early 40s. Speak like an auntie. Constantly niaming
Service: Started off well with helping you shower, although the bathroom is too small for both, and wiping dry. But went downhill subsequently. Went on turbo mode at the start trying to blow. Told her to lie down while i service her, this is where everything went downhill
1) Finger her for 20 sec - say itchy
2) Lick her nipples - also say itchy
Not sure what else to do - lay down, let her blow again. But i went soft coz of her attitude.

Started niaming. In the end, handjob coz i can't be bothered anymore. Paid and left.

i saw her long list of frequent consistently well written good FRs and i thought it was sus.

[Rabaraba85]

Originally Posted by kombust

i saw her long list of frequent consistently well written good FRs and i thought it was sus.

Agreed... vivi is a effing turn off. Physical appearance isnt bad but niaming non stop. Location also pretty effed up... need to walk 10 mins from nearest carpark

[lsjie]

Tried Rainie tt=4756

Location= nice hotel no need check in but need her come down pick u up from 2nd floor

Looks=80% like pics

Massage = press here there a bit
Catbath= 2/10 like 5mins only not good
BBBJ= 2/10 very short no feel one then proceed to cap on
FJ= 2/10 say tired after riding like 5mins, sian just faster finish in doggy/missionary
GFE= 2/10 not much, wont visit again

RTF?= landmine def no, waste time

[naruto99]

Any bro tried this viet before?

https://www.impmm23.com/girl.php?id=4883

[heige]

TT Le Er M4886

booked M4886, but they gave me TT Bella M4887

Location: convenient, but i cannot give more details as this area only got 1 spa.

just a warning for bros to beware of possible bait-and-switch.
while I'll RTF, I still think must be principled enough to call them out if they never gimme the girl i booked.

stuck with Bella as i like her looks... was a good bonk:
https://sbfonline.site/showpost.php?p=214...ostcount=10255

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by heige

TT Le Er M4886

booked M4886, but they gave me TT Bella M4887

Location: convenient, but i cannot give more details as this area only got 1 spa.

just a warning for bros to beware of possible bait-and-switch.
while I'll RTF, I still think must be principled enough to call them out if they never gimme the girl i booked.

stuck with Bella as i like her looks... was a good bonk:
https://sbfonline.site/showpost.php?p=214...ostcount=10255

Not bait and switch, the spa is OTK managed so when one not available they just shove another one at you and think you'll be okay because they are all syt. In general all their girls provide decent services, it's an annoying but common practice in spa joints like this

[Poworb]

https://isyou-8.com/model/an-qi-2513/
Avoid this
Looks 60% alike
Place hv 1M 2F,the other F cmi
Lupsup, no shower only wet tissue before n after...knn regret max

[dnomy]

Originally Posted by Rabaraba85

Agreed... vivi is a effing turn off. Physical appearance isnt bad but niaming non stop. Location also pretty effed up... need to walk 10 mins from nearest carpark

Visited her when she was at central some time ago at $200. Collected $$$ upfront.
Also agree she looks at least mid 30s and services are rushed with restrictions as mentioned. Pussy also a bit loose and will grumble if 5-10 mins don’t shoot. I just pulled out, showered and left at 30 min mark.

[321123]

https://$$$$$$$$$$$$$$-13.com/an-an-superb-chio-babe/
Looks maybe 40% only
Rush and give bad attitude when change position
Overall would not RTF. Regret going

[escobar43535]

Thanks for the FR bro

Suppose to try her some time back but had other distractions.

Now free was about to finally try her, then saw your FR which made me reconsider.

Interestingly enough i saw a negative FR on Verna in the T T site yesterday, all the other FRs were glowingly positive. However when i returned to the T T site today the negative FR had curiously disappeared

Similar thing happened with T T S4790 Jing Tian whom i had also been eyeing. Again a negative FR suddenly popped up yesterday but today it had disappeared, thus leaving only the glowingly positive FRs

Seems like T T site censors negative FRs but not immediately

Tbf guess both gals might have been pretty good when they first arrived but now that they have settled in possibly jaded and hence inconsistent

Originally Posted by snrlee

Verna tt=4773

Location= B area condo

Looks= 65% like pics ( pics prettier)

My experience with her is that she is one of those FL that does routine of showing attitude at the start of session like black face, everything not to her likings, cannot this cannot that then after you cum treat you like a long lost friend.

Think she knows that many bro tends to just want to cum fast when met with these bitchy attitude, just want to get over with it. But when things are over, their attitude change maybe because a. jobs done b. treat you nicely hope you don’t complaint too much?

No rtf.

[LooksLikeJesus]

Originally Posted by Maihums

There were quite a number of girls but I didn’t see anyone who is as pretty as advertised. Went once and i was blasted by the landmine..

Heard upper thomson is another one, any bro can share the address?
Thanks in advance.

As long as they stated it's thomson area. That's the only one.

[LooksLikeJesus]

Originally Posted by cheongster_11

Saw many bros warning about 266 Area B.
Saw quite a few listings that look yum.
Appreciate if fellow cheongsters can share FRs if try before. 10Q for helping to avoid land mines.

https://www.impmm22.com/girl.php?id=3858
Baobao 3858

Recently venturing from MLs to FLs.
Even photo verified also may be landmines?

How come no thread for Good FRs? 😅

There can be only 2 reasons, she turns out to be a landmine

1) It's a landmine after all
2) She doesnt feel like working that day, sub in the low biz lao auntie

[Rabaraba85]

$$$$$ on ++

Body is good, albeit fake boobs. Face is average.

Can take a pounding but clearly worked in whorehouse factory in china before. Every thing turned around in 20 minutes. After deed just do her own thing and ignore customer

[escobar43535]

Absolutely right bro

Afterall her price is at the higher end and also comes with the supposed accreditation "S".

Forgot to mention in my earlier post that i had also recently chanced upon a bad review FR for big boobs newbie N4906 An Na in the T T site which unsurprisingly disappeared the very next day and only left with glowingly positive FRs

Really pathetic when charging highest premium rates and the gal does not even come close to matching the young pretty description, also big tits apparently saggy

Originally Posted by snrlee

Happy to share bro.

And yes it is known that TT censors negative reviews and I suppose they ensured that the minimum number of people sees them.

Point is we are not really paying a low price for their service, it is unprofessional to show attitude or play tricks and hope to get away with it.

[octane67]

Any feedback on ++ luo luo or yi na? Both look good and really appealing to me...doesnt have to be a good bonk as long as it's not a super landmine!