Hi, seems like you are referring to me. Next time just reply to my comment or call me out will be much easier. Im a straight shooter who talks bluntly and not interested in playing petty games.
So lets get to it.
"Low standards" - This is not bringing the spirit of the forum down. In fact, its quite the opposite. I know there are many newbies and lurkers here who rely on these reviews to make their decisions. How do i know? Because my inbox keep getting new messages from such people.
In fact, im doing the opposite. Im doing everybody a favour by being transparent and telling the truth. Go look at all the reviews for the past 50 pages. How is it possible that 99% of these ladies have a 7//10 looks rating or better? Statistically, this is not possible.
The only reason is bros here like to sugarcoat their words and give politically correct reviews to prevent being "zapped" or some gay ass reason.
As requested, i will share some of my experience.
Any chiobu syt right now? Nope.
Review for a so-called popular ml named 99
Looks: 6.5/10. Nowhere as chio as her photos. Face more round and fat, not that sharp. Body not fat but not slim either, abit bah bah. People who say syt are probably trolling/delusional. For me syt is <24yrs,i estimate her real age is ard 28, and thats being generous. Service not bad, friendly, bubbly and chatty.
And guess what? She is considered one of the better ones in the market right now, so that should say something. This is how i justify that most bros here have "low standards". Feel free to disagree, this is just my honest opinion. I have no intention of "bringing the spirit of the forum down" as what you claimed.
Bro I completely agree with you. Standard of mls now are really low. No point trying to give a poor review or state any facts. The moment you give a low rating, they will have alot of their tiko uncle supporters come out to defend them. If you call them fat, old, auntie, ugly or etc, you will be labelled as being mean or insulting because it hurts those uncles so much that it causes them to bald. Majority always like to justify low standards as being subjective but it only stands against negative reviews. I have learnt how to interpret the ratings in this forum. If you see:
SYT - It means 28-35
Pre Milf - It means 36-44
Milf - It means 45 and above
Old - This can only be used if the ML’s hair is gray/white
Ugly - This can only be used if the ML is disfigured
Fat - This can only be used if the ML is more than 100kg
Once you understand the standards of this forum, you will be able to manage your expectations better. Unfortunately I cannot bring myself to pen such absurd stuff down because I am afraid I will get struck by lightning. I have stopped writing anymore reviews and only use the reviews here as a reference once in a while.
Bro I completely agree with you. Standard of mls now are really low. No point trying to give a poor review or state any facts. The moment you give a low rating, they will have alot of their tiko uncle supporters come out to defend them. If you call them fat, old, auntie, ugly or etc, you will be labelled as being mean or insulting because it hurts those uncles so much that it causes them to bald. Majority always like to justify low standards as being subjective but it only stands against negative reviews. I have learnt how to interpret the ratings in this forum. If you see:
SYT - It means 28-35
Pre Milf - It means 36-44
Milf - It means 45 and above
Old - This can only be used if the ML’s hair is gray/white
Ugly - This can only be used if the ML is disfigured
Fat - This can only be used if the ML is more than 100kg
Once you understand the standards of this forum, you will be able to manage your expectations better. Unfortunately I cannot bring myself to pen such absurd stuff down because I am afraid I will get struck by lightning. I have stopped writing anymore reviews and only use the reviews here as a reference once in a while.
Note : Penned by someone who got zapped to oblivion after his lies were exposed.
Yes, the quality of lookers are lacking here, but sorry dude, why are you so angry, aggressive and toxic in your writing? That's the issue here.
As another bro wrote , be objective. So if the ML isn't up to your taste, just say so. Say it as it is. But when posts include obvious attacks with words like "landmine", "fat, ugly", "lau aunties" and overly dramatic rants and raves, then that BS. That's toxic and brining the forum down. Because many of the MLs may not have great looks but they are deserving of some courtesy with their quality service.
Oh by the way, Xiaoxue has nice racks, yes. However, her flat backside and average dark village girl looks aren't attractive to me. Chiobu isnt a term i would use for her. Case in point.
You're being absolutely delusional. The words I used are not toxic at all. Let us try to find better alternative adjectives that are less "toxic" as you described.
"Fat"- this is a neutral objective term. It is simply a descriptive term with no negative connotations. Fat means fat, how else you want to phrase it? "She weighs on the heavier ends of the scale". You think this is shakespeare?
"Landmine" - This is one of the most astute and perfect words to describe ladies who post good pics but are fugly irl. In fact, I cant think of a better word. "She was a terrifying revelation" Like that suit you better?
"Ugly" - very offensive ah? Ok sorry, next time i will say " She was truly a terror to behold"
"Lao auntie" - when u visit cny as a young kid you dont say "Happy new year auntie" meh?. Old is offensive? Ok, next time i will say " She was a lady past her prime, her looks faded since years past"
Other bros, please let me know if my language is unacceptable. Never knew this was a forum for intellectual gentlemen. I will make it a point to use more elegant sophistries in the future.
Looks wise I was rather blown away during my first visit with her hair parted in the center, sitting across the dining table chatting... then 2nd-3rd visit sian liao, not really worth the hassle. Like during my time they say everyday see Britney Spears run naked down the street after a while also sian.
It’s okay to have one’s own opinions and yardsticks. But to make sweeping statements criticizing others for having low standards and having to conform to your yardstick is total uncalled for. Did they have a 10 rating? No right? So what’s wrong with a 7? Who in this big wide world do you think you are to impose your standards on others.
Point noted your yardsticks are very high. Pls keep them inside your trousers and respect others for their ratings.
Just cannot stay these self entitled asses
It’s okay to have one’s own opinions and yardsticks. But to make sweeping statements criticizing others for having low standards and having to conform to your yardstick is total uncalled for. Did they have a 10 rating? No right? So what’s wrong with a 7? Who in this big wide world do you think you are to impose your standards on others.
Point noted your yardsticks are very high. Pls keep them inside your trousers and respect others for their ratings.
Just cannot stay these self entitled asses
Who am i? Glad you asked.
I'm motherfucking Regretfulman, registered user of the anonymous sex forum known as sammyboy. Here to use my given right to post my unfiltered and unabashed opinions.
Btw, i never said that you cant give a 7. I said there is clearly a problem when the past 100 reviews give a rating of 7 and above. How the fuck is that even remotely possible? Clearly some people must be lying/have low standards or our tiny nation must be so blessed to have such nubile gems flooding our shores.
And one last question, how badly do you simp for MLs? Honest question, no judgement here.
I'm motherfucking Regretfulman, registered user of the anonymous sex forum known as sammyboy. Here to use my given right to post my unfiltered and unabashed opinions.
Btw, i never said that you cant give a 7. I said there is clearly a problem when the past 100 reviews give a rating of 7 and above. How the fuck is that even remotely possible? Clearly some people must be lying/have low standards or our tiny nation must be so blessed to have such nubile gems flooding our shores.
And one last question, how badly do you simp for MLs? Honest question, no judgement here.
To me 99 is a syt with looks 8 and good attitude. Who cares what u think haha
I'm motherfucking Regretfulman, registered user of the anonymous sex forum known as sammyboy. Here to use my given right to post my unfiltered and unabashed opinions.
Btw, i never said that you cant give a 7. I said there is clearly a problem when the past 100 reviews give a rating of 7 and above. How the fuck is that even remotely possible? Clearly some people must be lying/have low standards or our tiny nation must be so blessed to have such nubile gems flooding our shores.
And one last question, how badly do you simp for MLs? Honest question, no judgement here.
Sigh, fancy running into you here.
Using the word 'simp' already tells us here how young you are.
Anyway, you are entitled to your own views and that's fine. Just don't over generalise and apply the same yardstick to everyone else here.
I.E, I might rate a ML 7/10, doesn't mean someone else needs to rate 7/10 too. I also don't need to care what the other bros rate the ML coz that's their opinion too.
All FRs are subjective and only serves to help form a general idea of how the experience with the ML will be like, and remember, YMMV.
Pay a visit and was not disappointed.
Look: Not a syt but more of a GND. Wun reject and grows on u.
Boobs: Nice and firm big B small C with light color nips
Body: Petite, smooth skin
Massage: NA, not really for that purpose
Services: accommodating, very likable personality, skillful with her hand, soft moan surround sound.
Overall: Recommend to try , not going to be here for long.
I initially wanted to give 99 a shot but when I saw her looks, I reconsidered lol..
Of course that is not to say she is ugly by any means.. Just that her looks dun gum me.. Others will defo feel otherwise and keep her in their rotation..
YMMV, as usual..
When you said you saw her looks and reconsidered. You mean her posted photos don’t gum you? Really?
__________________
Save your bullets for a better catch
Bro I completely agree with you. Standard of mls now are really low. No point trying to give a poor review or state any facts. The moment you give a low rating, they will have alot of their tiko uncle supporters come out to defend them. If you call them fat, old, auntie, ugly or etc, you will be labelled as being mean or insulting because it hurts those uncles so much that it causes them to bald. Majority always like to justify low standards as being subjective but it only stands against negative reviews. I have learnt how to interpret the ratings in this forum. If you see:
SYT - It means 28-35
Pre Milf - It means 36-44
Milf - It means 45 and above
Old - This can only be used if the ML’s hair is gray/white
Ugly - This can only be used if the ML is disfigured
Fat - This can only be used if the ML is more than 100kg
Once you understand the standards of this forum, you will be able to manage your expectations better. Unfortunately I cannot bring myself to pen such absurd stuff down because I am afraid I will get struck by lightning. I have stopped writing anymore reviews and only use the reviews here as a reference once in a while.
Your rating is completely flawed. Please bring down 10 years younger. Don’t destroy our standard anymore.
__________________
Save your bullets for a better catch