which one (just for the fun of it)?

[iluvbreast]

talked to my buddy, W yesterday over lunch.......he is 2 timing at the moment (lucky bastard, because as far as I know he didn't do much, his look is so-so and his not rich) with his sub-contractor's daughter, S (rich, hot looking with great figure)......and his client's employee, D (not rich, parents are fishmongers, decent looking, sweet but nowhere as pretty, figure not bad, yes yes I sneaked a peek with we went out together).

I think W is getting worried as both gals are starting to get sticky after he bedded both of them (separately of course) and thinking of going long term with one only.

So naturally, being kaypoh, the group voiced their opinions to W, I being more pervert, asked about the intimate details privately after lunch. Turns out that is 1 major issue for W, S although hot-looking and takes care of him but is not really good in bed - a lot of restrictions, no bj, not really responsive, and don't fancy the exchange of bodily fluids

D on the other hand, seems less caring (or maybe because she is more self-reliant), but according to W seems to be very responsive to his every touch, W said she's really passionate. and she cums easily

so which one?

[halogen019]

If long term here means getting married and stuff like that, S is a better choice.

Sexual habits and practices can be nurtured and changed easier compared to accumulation of wealth and good looks.

The fact that he was able to bed them both even before being in a relationship shows that both S and D are open minded.

Besides, if W decides that his bedroom life gets boring after some time due to many restrictions, I am sure he knows where to find alternative fun.

Perhaps your buddy has not made S more horny. If he did, maybe BJ is not out of the question.