RAW is WAR.......Why?

[Puyo]

Global summary of the AIDS epidemic

December 2007

Number of people living with HIV in 2007
Total 33.2 million [30.6–36.1 million]
Adults 30.8 million [28.2–33.6 million]
Women 15.4 million [13.9–16.6 million]
Children under 15 years 2.5 million [2.2–2.6 million]

People newly infected with HIV in 2007
Total 2.5 million [1.8–4.1 million]
Adults 2.1 million [1.4–3.6 million]
Children under 15 years 420 000 [350 000–540 000]

AIDS deaths in 2007 Total 2.1 million [1.9–2.4 million]
Adults 1.7 million [1.6–2.1 million]
Children under 15 years 330 000 [310 000–380 000]

Source: http://data.unaids.org/pub/EPISlides...iupdate_en.pdf

Every day, over 6800 persons become infected with HIV and over 570 persons die from AIDS, mostly because of inadequate access to HIV prevention and treatment services.

In China, AIDS is spreading mad among drug users. A Even faster epidemic than Sex.

Source: http://data.unaids.org/pub/Report/20...fs_asia_en.pdf

With all these happening, People if still insist in RAW is really playing with Death. With 4.6 Million in singapore, all it takes is 10 unreported cases to wipe out the whole nation in 3 years.

Our fore fathers, build this place with their bare hands and we had suffered greatly before our golden years, today we experienced many rewards and so much vested interest, its truly a waste that some inconsiderate humans would take a risk with fate putting everyone at the edge.

Think about this:

1 infected man had sex with another = 2

2 x 2 = 4
4 x 4 = 16
16 x 16 = 256
256 x 256 = 65536
65536 x 65536 = 429 496 7269

Work out the maths and just see for yourself if we have a few fucked up bastards who just love using ONLY Flesh. This is how we will be ruined.

Guys, Can we Pls be more responsible in our actions. Read those updates from the websites about AIDS, it really takes every individual to be Pro-active for this World to be safe enough for our future generations.

If one's living is not a good enough reason to have safe sex, pls wear rubber for the sake of your kid who might potentially be exposed in future.

Sad to read threads about people still doing RAW these days.

[84gunner]

If SGP gals / women can sextify their bfs / husbands more, the guys are much less likely to eat outside, which will oso reduce the risk & spread significantly.

[Puyo]

Originally Posted by 84gunner

If SGP gals / women can sextify their bfs / husbands more, the guys are much less likely to eat outside, which will oso reduce the risk & spread significantly.

No wonder Mixed Marriages are also on the rise!

[goodpartner]

Originally Posted by Puyo

Global summary of the AIDS epidemic

School holiday doing mid-year project research?


okie, I'm joking. Thanks for the reminder

[topcook1]

Sounds scary up til now still now cure??? HIV has been around for 2 years right?

[Xena]

?? hmmm

[topcook1]

Originally Posted by topcook1

Sounds scary up til now still now cure??? HIV has been around for 2 years right?

Sorry is 20 years +++

[sammyboyfor]

You are talking absolute hogwash!

Your statistics assume that the probability of transmission of the HIV virus is close to 100%! In reality, the probability of transmission per act from an HIV positive woman to an HIV negative partner is only 0.0013 if no protection is used.

There is therefore no way that infection rates can follow a geometric progression.

This "raw is war" crap is a load of bull. Whores are free to do as they please with their customers and the decision whether or not to use protection is a matter of private negotiation between customer and sex worker.

ALL whores should be treated as potentially HIV positive by those who fear catching the deadly disease. In order to protect themselves, they should use condoms. It is none of their business whether or not whores use condoms with other customers or with their husbands, boyfriends, lovers, teraks and what have you.

You have been zapped for your stupid comments.

Originally Posted by Puyo

Think about this:

1 infected man had sex with another = 2

2 x 2 = 4
4 x 4 = 16
16 x 16 = 256
256 x 256 = 65536
65536 x 65536 = 429 496 7269

Work out the maths and just see for yourself if we have a few fucked up bastards who just love using ONLY Flesh. This is how we will be ruined.

[cumshot4u]

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor

You have been zapped for your stupid comments.

Why zapped him? He got data from UNAIDS and WHO, u have or not?

[colins]

Originally Posted by Puyo

People newly infected with HIV in 2007
Total 2.5 million [1.8–4.1 million]
Adults 2.1 million [1.4–3.6 million]
Children under 15 years 420 000 [350 000–540 000]

Think about this:

1 infected man had sex with another = 2

2 x 2 = 4
4 x 4 = 16
16 x 16 = 256
256 x 256 = 65536
65536 x 65536 = 429 496 7269

Work out the maths and just see for yourself if we have a few fucked up bastards who just love using ONLY Flesh. This is how we will be ruined.

Thanks for the reminder, I'm all for condoms. The 429.5 million infections from 2 sources sounds like resident evil.

Ok if 2 men can start a epidemic of 429 million infected cases, and we now have 33 million HIV positives, why are there only 2.5M new cases? At this rate where new cases is almost the same amount as AIDS related deaths, it sort of hard to work out the large increase required to call it an epidemic.

But then if the new cases are all in cities (and not in africa or some third world countries), then this is serious cause for concerns. Adding to the fact that city folks are much more well informed than village folks, that means a shift in the people getting AIDS, and they got it actually by choice (as in they know and still ignore the warning).

Just dun take unnecessary risk la.

[goodpartner]

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor

In reality, the probability of transmission per act from an HIV positive woman to an HIV negative partner is only 0.0013 if no protection is used.

And then the probability is also different depending on the mating pair. E.g. HIV positive male to female has a higher transmission rate than HIV positive female to a male. Due to more profound transmission of virus carrying bodily fluid (sperm) into the female's system.

Not sure about male to male probability, but I guess it depends on how the pair of homo fcuk each other; any possibility in transmission of blood/body fluid.

So TS, these are all good research topics to cover and beef up your school report

[sammyboyfor]

Originally Posted by cumshot4u

Why zapped him? He got data from UNAIDS and WHO, u have or not?

I have no problems with the data from the world health organisation and the UN.

I do take issue with the claim that the spread of HIV follows a geometric progression.

[easybaby]

Patients suffering from HIV may appear healthy, and symptoms may appear only after a few years. So we may not be so sure to who's infected and who's not if the patient doesn't go for regular check up i guess?

Anyway, some patients might be HIV carriers but do not progress into AIDS. There are also people who are rather resistant to HIV infections, generally due to genetic mutations that are non-fatal.

I'm not trying to encourage raw sex. Just some info that i find interesting to share. Not everyone who comes into contact with a HIV infected person gets it, but it's still better to be safe.

Lastly, if the geometric progression thing was true... we would have been wiped out a long time ago. Because AIDS was recognised and defined in early 1980s.

[cumshot4u]

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor

In reality, the probability of transmission per act from an HIV positive woman to an HIV negative partner is only 0.0013 if no protection is used.

0.0013?? Where did u get this info??

[goodpartner]

I heard of this so-called immunity to HIV by certain individuals but are there any studies on them to "extract" the immunity from them to get a vaccine? It would be nice if there's any test out there we can take to see if one is "immune" or not, so at least can get more peace in mind when bonking